China’s Growing Influence in Latin America
Backgrounder

China’s Growing Influence in Latin America

For more than two decades, China has developed close economic and security ties with many Latin American countries, including Brazil, Peru, and Venezuela. But Beijing’s increasing sway in the region continues to raise concerns in Washington, prompting greater U.S. engagement.
Chinese shipping giant COSCO owns a majority stake in a new megaport in Chancay, Peru.
Chinese shipping giant COSCO owns a majority stake in a new megaport in Chancay, Peru. Cris Bouroncle/AFP/Getty Images
Summary
  • China is South America’s top trading partner and a major source of both foreign direct investment and energy and infrastructure lending, including through its massive Belt and Road Initiative. 
  • Beijing has invested heavily in Latin America’s space sector and has strengthened its military ties with several countries, particularly Venezuela.
  • Policymakers in Washington previously sought new trade and investment avenues to counter Beijing’s influence, but President Donald Trump has adopted a more assertive approach to the region in his second term.

Introduction

China’s role in Latin America and the Caribbean has grown rapidly since the turn of the century, promising economic opportunity but also raising concerns over Beijing’s influence. China’s state firms are major investors in the region’s energy, infrastructure, and space industries, and the country has surpassed the United States as South America’s largest trading partner. Beijing has also expanded its cultural, diplomatic, and military presence throughout the region. In May 2025, China hosted Latin American and Caribbean leaders at a summit in Beijing, where Chinese President Xi Jinping announced a $9 billion investment credit line for the region.

More From Our Experts

The United States and its allies fear that China is using these relationships to pursue its geopolitical goals, including further isolating Taiwan and bolstering authoritarian regimes such as those in Cuba and Venezuela. While U.S. President Joe Biden saw China as a “strategic competitor” in the region, the reelection of Donald Trump has marked a shift in U.S. policy toward Latin America, characterized by assertive economic measures that experts say could push countries further toward China.

What is China’s history with Latin America?

More on:

China

Latin America

Trade

Development

Brazil

China’s ties to the region date to the sixteenth century, when the Manila Galleon trade route facilitated the exchange of porcelain, silk, and spices between China and Mexico. By the 1840s, hundreds of thousands of Chinese immigrants were being sent to work as coolies, or indentured servants, in places such as Cuba and Peru, often on sugar plantations or in silver mines. Over the next century, China’s ties to the region were largely migration-related as Beijing remained preoccupied with its own domestic upheaval.

Most Latin American countries recognized Mao Zedong’s communist government following U.S. President Richard Nixon’s trip to China in 1972, but it was not until after China’s entry into the World Trade Organization in 2001 that they began to form robust cultural, economic, and political ties. Today, Brazil, Cuba, Paraguay, Peru, and Venezuela are among the Latin American countries with the largest Chinese diaspora communities.

How have economic relations developed?

In 2000, the Chinese market accounted for less than 2 percent of Latin America’s exports, but China’s rapid growth and resulting demand drove the region’s subsequent commodities boom. Over the next eight years, trade grew at an annual rate of 31 percent [PDF]. By 2021, trade exceeded $450 billion—a figure which grew to a record $518 billion in 2024, according to Chinese state media—and some economists predict that it could exceed $700 billion by 2035. China currently ranks as South America’s top trading partner and the second largest for Latin America as a whole, after the United States.

More From Our Experts

Latin America’s primary exports to China include soybeans and other vegetables, animal products, copper, petroleum, oil, and other raw materials that the country needs to drive its industrial development. In return, the region mostly imports higher-value-added manufactured products, a trade some experts say has undercut local industries with cheaper Chinese goods. As of 2024, Beijing has signed free trade agreements with Chile, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Nicaragua, and Peru. Trade talks with Uruguay have fallen through due to opposition from the Mercosur trade bloc, but more than twenty countries in Latin America and the Caribbean have signed on to China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), the most recent being Colombia.

Chinese outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) and loans also play a major role in strengthening ties with the region. In 2024, China’s OFDI in Latin America and the Caribbean amounted to roughly $8.5 billion, or approximately 6 percent of China’s total OFDI. Meanwhile, the state-owned China Development Bank and the Export-Import Bank of China are among the region’s leading lenders; since 2005, they have loaned more than $120 billion to Latin American and Caribbean countries and state-owned enterprises, often in exchange for oil and used to fund energy and infrastructure projects. Venezuela is by far the biggest borrower; it has received nearly $60 billion worth of Chinese state loans, mostly relating to energy and infrastructure. That is nearly double the amount for the second-largest borrower, Brazil. Additionally, China is a nonborrowing, voting member of the Inter-American Development Bank and the Caribbean Development Bank.

More on:

China

Latin America

Trade

Development

Brazil

At a May 2025 ministerial meeting of the China-Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) forum in Beijing, China pledged to ramp up its engagement in the region. President Xi announced a more than $9 billion yuan-dominated credit line to CELAC members for cooperation programs focused on topics including development and peace and security, as well as visa-free travel for five unspecified countries. Experts say the investment underscores Beijing’s push to position itself as a critical partner to fill the regional void left by the United States under President Trump.

However, these growing economic ties have raised some concerns, particularly among Latin American governments. Although Chinese loans often have fewer conditions attached, dependence on them can push economically unstable countries such as Venezuela into what critics call debt traps that can result in default. Indeed, several Latin American countries are seeking to renegotiate the terms of their debt. Critics also say that Chinese companies bring lower environmental and labor standards and warn that China’s growing control over critical infrastructure such as ports and energy grids poses national security risks. There are also fears of growing economic dependency in countries such as Chile, which sent almost $38 billion worth of exports—about 38 percent of its total—to China in 2023.

What are China’s political interests in the region?

At the forefront is China’s desire to expand its sphere of influence through “South-South cooperation” [PDF], a development framework focused on aid, investment, and trade. China’s focus on soft power—including strengthening cultural and educational ties—has helped Beijing build political goodwill with local governments and present itself as a viable alternative partner to the United States and Europe.

Since former Chinese President Jiang Zemin’s landmark thirteen-day tour of Latin America in 2001, there have been dozens of high-level political exchanges. President Xi has visited the region at least five times since he took office in 2013. In return, a record eight presidents from the region visited China in 2023, versus just one in 2022 and none in 2021 and 2020. In addition to several bilateral agreements with countries in the region, China has signed comprehensive strategic partnerships [PDF]—its most common type of diplomatic relationship—with Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru, and Venezuela.

China’s push to isolate Taiwan is another major factor behind its interest in the region. Because Beijing refuses diplomatic relations with countries that recognize Taiwan’s sovereignty, Latin America’s support for the island has dwindled in recent years; only Belize, Guatemala, Haiti, and Paraguay still recognize it, alongside the Caribbean countries of Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. Honduras was the most recent to switch diplomatic allegiance to Beijing in 2023 after Taipei denied the country’s request for billions of dollars of aid. That same year, the Central American Parliament voted to expel Taiwan as a permanent observer and replace it with China.

Meanwhile, some observers say growing China-Latin America ties are bolstering authoritarian governments, including those in Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela. China’s role in such countries is that of “an incubator of populism,” says Evan Ellis, a research professor of Latin American Studies at the U.S. Army War College Strategic Studies Institute. “It’s not that China’s trying to produce antidemocratic regimes, but that antidemocratic regimes find a willing partner in the Chinese.”

What security ties do they have?

Chinese government strategy on Latin America, as defined in its 2016 Policy White Paper and others, has underscored the importance of security and defense cooperation. China’s efforts to forge stronger military ties with its Latin American counterparts include arms sales, military exchanges, and training programs.

Venezuela remains the region’s top purchaser of Chinese military hardware after the U.S. government prohibited all commercial arms sales to Caracas beginning in 2006. Argentina, Bolivia, and Ecuador have also bought [PDF] Chinese military aircraft, ground vehicles, radar systems, assault rifles, and other equipment. Likewise, Cuba has sought to strengthen military ties with China, hosting the Chinese People’s Liberation Army for port visits and training. U.S. intelligence officials have also raised alarm bells over evidence that China is strengthening its intelligence cooperation with the island. (Russia has also shored up its relations with Cuba in recent years.)

China also participated in the UN peacekeeping mission in Haiti that began in 2004, including by deploying more than one hundred riot police to the country. After less than a decade, China withdrew from Haiti, but it still leads military training exercises across the region and provides supplies to local law enforcement. For example, China provided Bolivian police departments with anti-riot gear and military vehicles during the Evo Morales Ayma administration (2006–2019), donated transportation equipment and motorcycles to police forces in Guyana and Trinidad and Tobago, and provided Ecuador with tens of thousands of automatic weapons.

What are other major areas of bilateral cooperation?

Energy. Between 2000 and 2018, China invested $73 billion in Latin America’s raw materials sector, including for the construction of refineries and processing plants in countries with significant amounts of coal, copper, natural gas, oil, and uranium. More recently, Beijing has focused on investing in lithium production in the so-called Lithium Triangle countries of Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile; together, the triad contains roughly half of the world’s known lithium, a critical mineral for electric vehicles and batteries.

Chinese state-owned firms are heavily involved in energy development; PowerChina, for example, has projects underway in eleven Latin American countries as of 2022. In 2023, China paid around $3 billion to acquire two Peruvian electricity suppliers from Italy’s biggest utility company, garnering what some experts have called a near monopoly on Peru’s electricity distribution. But the scale and scope of these efforts are stoking environmental and health worries. China has nevertheless taken an interest in the region’s renewable energy sector, funding major solar and wind projects such as Latin America’s largest solar plant in Jujuy, Argentina, and the Punta Sierra wind farm in Coquimbo, Chile. 

Health. Many experts say that China’s COVID-19 diplomacy in Latin America was an effort to improve its image and curry favor with regional governments. This included distributing medical equipment such as ventilators and diagnostic test kits, offering billions of dollars in loans for countries to purchase Chinese vaccines, and investing in local vaccine production facilities. Some analysts suspected that China was also using its vaccine leverage to push for the expansion of Huawei, the controversial Chinese telecommunications giant. In Brazil, regulators reversed an earlier decision to bar Huawei from developing the country’s 5G networks weeks after Beijing provided Brasília with millions of vaccine doses.

Infrastructure. Beijing has financed construction projects [PDF] across the region, focusing on airports, highways, ports, and railways. Chinese entities have established varying levels of ownership or control over more than one hundred port projects worldwide, including at least a dozen across Latin America and the Caribbean. In late 2024, China opened a new megaport in Peru, opening doors for more Chinese investment in South America. 

Meanwhile, China remains concentrated on building and developing “new infrastructure,” including artificial intelligence, renewable energy, smart cities, and 5G technology from telecom firms such as Huawei. Despite U.S. warnings against using Huawei equipment, which policymakers say leaves countries vulnerable to cyber threats from China, countries in the region are increasingly doing so. In 2022, for example, Huawei launched a two-year 5G City pilot project in Curitiba, Brazil, where more than half of 3G and 4G mobile networks in the country run on Huawei equipment, according to company estimates.

Space. Beijing has also sought to strengthen space cooperation with Latin America, beginning when China signed a series of agreements to develop a satellite with Brazil in 1984. In the past few decades, China has regularly made space-related collaboration offers to several Latin American countries, including Venezuela, and in April 2024, it held the first China-Latin American and Caribbean States Space Cooperation Forum. Beijing also pushed for the creation of the Joint Committee on Space Cooperation within the BRICS alliance, which includes Brazil; the committee, established in 2022, is intended to promote data-sharing between satellites. China’s largest nondomestic space facility is located in Argentina’s Patagonian Desert, and it has satellite ground stations in several other countries, including Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, and Venezuela. Their proximity to the United States has heightened fears that they could be used to spy on U.S. assets. 

How has the United States responded?

U.S. policymakers and military officials have raised concerns about China’s growing presence in Latin America even as Washington remains focused elsewhere, especially on major ongoing conflicts in Europe and the Middle East. “China’s growing presence poses a direct challenge to U.S. dominance in the region,” the Atlantic Council’s Enrique Millán-Mejía wrote in May 2025. “For the United States, failure to recalibrate its approach to regional diplomacy risks further alienation and erosion of soft power in its traditional sphere of influence.” During his first term in office, President Trump took a more hard-line approach than his predecessors by imposing sanctions on several countries, including Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela, and slashed aid to others, most prominent being the so-called Northern Triangle countries in Central America. Some analysts say these actions drove certain governments closer to China. Trump also stepped back from trade relations with the region, withdrawing from the Trans-Pacific Partnership.

President Biden, who took the lead on Latin America policy during his tenure as vice president to Barack Obama, long argued that the United States should renew its leadership role in the region to counter a rising China. Calling China a “strategic competitor” [PDF] and pledging to strengthen U.S. partnerships in the Western Hemisphere, Biden launched Build Back Better World (B3W) in 2021 with his Group of Seven (G7) counterparts. The initiative aimed to counter China’s BRI by developing infrastructure in low- and middle-income countries, including in Latin America. However, the Biden administration committed only $6 million to B3W in its first year, and it was later renamed the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment. At the 2022 Summit of the Americas, Biden announced a range of new economic initiatives, including the creation of the Americas Partnership for Economic Prosperity, which seeks to make the region more economically competitive.

Additionally, the Biden administration sought to shore up support for Taiwan and continued to raise concerns about Huawei. Still, some experts argue Biden didn’t focus enough on the region, particularly with regard to trade. The 2024 annual report [PDF] by the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, an independent agency of the U.S. government, underscored the challenges that Beijing’s growing influence in Latin America poses to Washington.

Meanwhile, bipartisan legislation introduced by then Senator Bob Menendez (D-NJ) and then Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) in 2022 sought to counter China’s “malign influence” in the region by strengthening multilateral security cooperation and counternarcotics efforts. Other legislative proposals include calls for the United States to create permanent trade partnerships with countries in the Western Hemisphere to encourage the “reshoring” of supply chains from China to countries closer to home. Neither bill advanced in Congress.

In his second term, President Trump has taken a more assertive approach to countering China’s regional influence. He has repeatedly alleged that China secretly controls the Panama Canal, despite Panamanian ownership, and threatened to retake the waterway, which the United States handed over to Panama in 1999. The Trump administration has also wielded tariffs, imposing a baseline 10 percent tariff on most countries, including those in Latin America, with higher tariffs on Mexico due to concerns related to immigration and drug trafficking. Many experts believe such measures will end up hurting the U.S. economy and ceding some trade to China. Trump’s focus on border control could also spell problems for Latin American countries, as many depend on remittances from the United States to boost their economies.

Recommended Resources

The Congressional Research Service details China’s engagement with Latin America [PDF].

CFR Senior Fellow for China Studies Zongyuan Zoe Liu tracks China’s investments in airports and control of overseas ports.

The Wall Street Journal’s James T. Areddy, Ryan Dubé, and Roque Ruiz explain how China capitalized on U.S. indifference in Latin America.

For Americas Quarterly, Brenda Estefan explores how Latin American countries will navigate the U.S.-China power struggle in the new Trump era.

A database from the Inter-American Dialogue and Boston University’s Global Development Policy Center tracks Chinese loans to Latin America.

For Foreign Affairs, the Getulio Vargas Foundation’s Matias Spektor unpacks why the Western Hemisphere is turning away from the United States and towards China.

Creative Commons
Creative Commons: Some rights reserved.
Close
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License.
View License Detail

Esther Sun contributed to this report. Will Merrow helped create the graphics.

For media inquiries on this topic, please reach out to [email protected].
Close

Top Stories on CFR

Trade

President Trump doubled almost all aluminum and steel import tariffs, seeking to curb China’s growing dominance in global trade. These six charts show the tariffs’ potential economic effects.

Ukraine

The Sanctioning Russia Act would impose history’s highest tariffs and tank the global economy. Congress needs a better approach, one that strengthens existing sanctions and adds new measures the current bill ignores.

China Strategy Initiative

At the Shangri-La dialogue in Singapore last week, U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said that the United States would be expanding its defense partnership with India. His statement was in line with U.S. policy over the last two decades, which, irrespective of the party in power, has sought to cultivate India as a serious defense partner. The U.S.-India defense partnership has come a long way. Beginning in 2001, the United States and India moved from little defense cooperation or coordination to significant gestures that would lay the foundation of the robust defense partnership that exists today—such as India offering access to its facilities after 9/11 to help the United States launch operations in Afghanistan or the 123 Agreement in 2005 that paved the way for civil nuclear cooperation between the two countries. In the United States, there is bipartisan agreement that a strong defense partnership with India is vital for its Indo-Pacific strategy and containing China. In India, too, there is broad political support for its strategic partnership with the United States given its immense wariness about its fractious border relationship with China. Consequently, the U.S.-India bilateral relationship has heavily emphasized security, with even trade tilting toward defense goods. Despite the massive changes to the relationship in the last few years, and both countries’ desire to develop ever-closer defense ties, differences between the United States and India remain. A significant part of this has to do with the differing norms that underpin the defense interests of each country. The following Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) memos by defense experts in three countries are part of a larger CFR project assessing India’s approach to the international order in different areas, and illustrate India’s positions on important defense issues—military operationalization, cooperation in space, and export controls—and how they differ with respect to the United States and its allies. Sameer Lalwani (Washington, DC) argues that the two countries differ in their thinking about deterrence, and that this is evident in three categories crucial to defense: capability, geography, and interoperability. When it comes to increasing material capabilities, for example, India prioritizes domestic economic development, including developing indigenous capabilities (i.e., its domestic defense-industrial sector). With regard to geography, for example, the United States and its Western allies think of crises, such as Ukraine, in terms of global domino effects; India, in contrast, thinks regionally, and confines itself to the effects on its neighborhood and borders (and, as the recent crisis with Pakistan shows, India continues to face threats on its border, widening the geographic divergence with the United States). And India’s commitment to strategic autonomy means the two countries remain far apart on the kind of interoperability required by modern military operations. Yet there is also reason for optimism about the relationship as those differences are largely surmountable. Dimitrios Stroikos (London) argues that India’s space policy has shifted from prioritizing socioeconomic development to pursuing both national security and prestige. While it is party to all five UN space treaties that govern outer space and converges with the United States on many issues in the civil, commercial, and military domains of space, India is careful with regard to some norms. It favors, for example, bilateral initiatives over multilateral, and the inclusion of Global South countries in institutions that it believes to be dominated by the West. Konark Bhandari (New Delhi) argues that India’s stance on export controls is evolving. It has signed three of the four major international export control regimes, but it has to consistently contend with the cost of complying, particularly as the United States is increasingly and unilaterally imposing export control measures both inside and outside of those regimes. When it comes to export controls, India prefers trade agreements with select nations, prizes its strategic autonomy (which includes relations with Russia and China through institutions such as the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and the BRICS), and prioritizes its domestic development. Furthermore, given President Donald Trump’s focus on bilateral trade, the two countries’ differences will need to be worked out if future tech cooperation is to be realized.